The aftermath of the Marches in March have been too much for
right wing commentator Chris Kenny’s gentle soul to take, and he’s walked away from the ugliness of the lefty-dominated Twitter.
Profane, violent and sexist,
these attacks usually emanate from anonymous or fake accounts. Both ends of the
political spectrum dish it out but, given Twitter's strong green-Left bias, the
slurs from the Left dominate, shouting down voices from the Centre Right and
spreading the sort of personal hate we saw in the March in March protests last
weekend.
Those placards about killing or
retrospectively aborting Tony Abbott were shocking to see on our streets but
such sentiments would hardly raise an eyebrow on Twitter.
Mr Kenny, like so many right wing figures before him, has
proven that he just doesn’t know how to use social media. He was, until a
couple of days ago, a frequent tweeter, and because his position is so
staunchly pro-Coalition and anti-Labor/Greens, the response to his tweets was
often strongly worded…and worse.
That’s Twitter for you.
He’s certainly not alone in being the target of some nasty
treatment, but rather than walking away, why wasn’t Mr Kenny managing his Twitter
feed? As soon as anyone indulged in unacceptable (as defined by Chris Kenny
himself) tweeting, he has the facility to block them. Even Paul Murray, his
conservative colleague at Sky News Australia recommended that he stop
complaining and just block the offenders. That he didn’t do that strikes me as
bizarre. He did not have to endure Twitter abuse; no-one does.
Piers Akerman, Chris Kenny, Alan Jones, Andrew Bolt |
It’s awkward to make an unbiased comparison with commentators
from the left, as they don’t exist en masse. David Marr doesn’t tweet, although
Mike Carlton does. Labor politicians are largely comfortable in the Twittersphere,
yet Coalition politicians are discouraged from using Twitter. This imbalance
could be why Mr Kenny perceives a Twitter bias favouring the left, and cutting
himself off from the collected wisdom and flavour of day to day political tweeting
is denying himself valuable insight. It’s not a socialist echo-chamber; ten
minutes visiting the #auspol hashtag is all the proof he would need.
Mr Kenny’s Twitter rejection is all too reminiscent of the recent threat by Andrew Bolt to quit his career as a conservative commentator
after Professor Marcia Langton blamed him, on QandA, for driving an aboriginal
academic away from public life. Professor Langton later clarified her comments,
and an apology was issued by the QandA programme for airing the comments.
But Bolt, the Australian conservative defender, used his
column to have a mighty sook. It was a piece of psychological manipulation
designed to whip his fans into a froth of protective fervour.
And when Attorney-General George
Brandis hotly insisted I was not racist, the ABC audience laughed in derision.
Not one other panellist protested against this lynching. In fact, host Tony
Jones asked Brandis to defend “those sort of facts” and Channel 9 host Lisa
Wilkinson accused me of “bullying”.
That immediate reaction from the QandA studio is similar to
the cadence of Twitter. The ABC audience did laugh and the panellists didn’t
protest at the idea of Andrew Bolt being anything but racist – that should tell
Andrew Bolt something about how he is perceived by an audience that identified
itself as 48% Coalition and 48% ALP/Greens.
Of course Bolt didn’t quit, and I expect to see Chris Kenny
back on Twitter sooner rather than later. After all, he hasn’t deleted his
Twitter accounts, he hasn’t deleted his tweets, and despite this week’s
decision, Chris Kenny enjoys the interaction, the profile, the discussion.
No comments:
Post a Comment